Anti-sugar campaigners concentrate on fructose because it is metabolised differently to sucrose (desk sugar) and glucose; fructose is broken down by the liver and, the theory goes, overloads it leading to a plethora of health circumstances together with diabetes, most cancers, weight problems and non-alcoholic fatty liver illness.
But new analysis out of the College of Canberra suggests it’s exactly the truth that fructose is processed by the liver that makes it a healthier choice.
“Conflicting proof exists on the consequences of fructose consumption in individuals with sort 1 and sort 2 diabetes mellitus,” stated the authors of the research revealed in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Dr Kerry Mills, the lead writer, and her staff examined the prevailing research to see if they might distinguish between the consequences of fructose, glucose and sucrose.
Many studies have been of rats, whose metabolism could be very totally different to humans. “The researchers typically extrapolate the outcomes erroneously from animals to humans,” she stated.
Moreover, many studies on fructose have been “poorly designed”, Mills stated, and did not management for variations in the kind of sugar. As an alternative, many gave one group fructose and the other no sugar.
Other articles you might like;
- Colour-changing tattoo ink could help people with diabetes
- Scientists reveal THIS technique can make you lose 2.5st in four months – without dieting
- ‘Alexa, what’s my blood sugar level and how much insulin should I take?’
- The Truth Behind Common Apple Cider Vinegar Uses You've Likely Heard Before
- Eating red onions ‘can prevent cancer’ and could protect against diabetes and heart disease